On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 02:22:32PM +0200, Hauke Fath wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> shouldn't the sysutils/xen* packages all be restricted to the appropriate
> platforms - i386, I guess? Or what is the point of building, say,
> xenkernel20 on mac68k? Did I miss any spectacular news?  ;)
> 
> fattie# ls -ld xen*
> drwxr-xr-x  5 root  wsrc  512 May 23 00:19 xen12
> drwxr-xr-x  5 root  wsrc  512 Aug  1  2006 xenconsole
> drwxr-xr-x  3 root  wsrc  512 May 26 00:06 xenkernel20
> drwxr-xr-x  3 root  wsrc  512 Jun 24 00:35 xenkernel3
> drwxr-xr-x  4 root  wsrc  512 May 23 00:21 xentools12
> drwxr-xr-x  5 root  wsrc  512 May 23 00:22 xentools20
> drwxr-xr-x  5 root  wsrc  512 Jun 24 00:35 xentools3
> drwxr-xr-x  5 root  wsrc  512 Jun 24 00:35 xentools3-hvm
> drwxr-xr-x  3 root  wsrc  512 Jun 24 00:50 xentools30
> drwxr-xr-x  3 root  wsrc  512 Jun 24 00:50 xentools30-hvm
> fattie# grep -H ONLY_FOR_PLATFORM ./xen*/Makefile
> ./xen12/Makefile:ONLY_FOR_PLATFORM=     *-*-i386
> ./xentools12/Makefile:ONLY_FOR_PLATFORM=        *-*-i386
> ./xentools20/Makefile:ONLY_FOR_PLATFORM=        Linux-2.[46]*-i386
> NetBSD-*-i386
> ./xentools3-hvm/Makefile:ONLY_FOR_PLATFORM=     Linux-2.[46]*-i386
> NetBSD-*-i386
> ./xentools3/Makefile:ONLY_FOR_PLATFORM= Linux-2.[46]*-i386 NetBSD-*-i386
> fattie#
> 
> (xenvstat removed from output)

Note that xentools30* should be empty. It would make sense to restrict
xenkernel3 to i386, but xenconsole may make sense on non-i386 too: it can
be used across network.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--