On 22/06/2007, at 18:58, Dan McMahill wrote:

> Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
>> Would you object if it was moved to an independent gtk-demo  
>> package?  (If it proves to cut down the build times significantly?)
>> Thanks,
>> --Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmerino@ac.upc.edu>
>
> not my top choice but I can live with that approach.  Can it be  
> setup to automatically be updated when gtk is updated?

Err... and what does update mean in the pkgsrc context?  I mean,  
which approach are you following?

We could make this gtk-demo package depend on a explicit version of  
gtk (modulo the revisions).  This way you'd be forced to keep it in  
sync with its corresponding gtk package.

-- 
Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv84@gmail.com>