Greg Troxel <gdt@ir.bbn.com> writes:

> Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:44:08AM +0200, Dieter Baron wrote:
>>>   What exactly is the problem here?  Are you saying we do not provide
>>> binary packages for any package with LICENSE set?  If so, I consider
>>> that a serious bug.
>>
>> Not consistently. Some of those packages set RESTRICTED, others set
>> NO_BIN_ON_FTP. I wouldn't be surprised if some don't do either.
>> Examples are:
>> textproc/cdif
>> sysutils/tdir
>> sysutils/sysinfo
>> sysutils/su2
>> sysutils/fs-kit
>> security/srp_client
>> security/rsaref
>> security/msf
>> security/hydra
>>
>> Many of those are non-commerical-only. I would argue that we violate the
>> tdir-license by not distributing the CHANGELOG.

I just took a pass through and added RESTRICTED to many.  Some of them
are non-free but not RESTRICTED and that's ok.

You may be right about tdir, and the easy fix is to put CHANGELOG in
share/doc.