Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de> writes:

> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:44:08AM +0200, Dieter Baron wrote:
>>   What exactly is the problem here?  Are you saying we do not provide
>> binary packages for any package with LICENSE set?  If so, I consider
>> that a serious bug.
>
> Not consistently. Some of those packages set RESTRICTED, others set
> NO_BIN_ON_FTP. I wouldn't be surprised if some don't do either.
> Examples are:
> textproc/cdif
> sysutils/tdir
> sysutils/sysinfo
> sysutils/su2
> sysutils/fs-kit
> security/srp_client
> security/rsaref
> security/msf
> security/hydra
>
> Many of those are non-commerical-only. I would argue that we violate the
> tdir-license by not distributing the CHANGELOG.

I fixed msf, and didn't find a reason to change hydra and srp_client.
It's not intrsinsically a bug to have LICENSE but not RESTRICTED.

For tdir, I think we should set all 4 of NO_*_ON_*; "the user
understands" is an odd condition.