--pgp-sign-Multipart_Sun_Jun_10_14:37:06_2007-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At Fri,  8 Jun 2007 12:14:40 +0200 (CEST), Dieter Baron wrote:
Subject: Re: emacs22
>=20
>   Because having separate packages for different build options does
> not scale well and is hard to maintain.

Indeed.

>   What we should do is specify which option combinations are important
> enough so we want binary packages for them and then build all of those
> during a bulk build.

I think it is EXTREMELY important to be able to (optionally) build all
of the desired binary package variants all simultaneously with a single
"make package" run, i.e. without having to use the "bulk build" stuff.

--=20
						Greg A. Woods

H:+1 416 218-0098 W:+1 416 489-5852 x122 VE3TCP RoboHack <woods@robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>       Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>

--pgp-sign-Multipart_Sun_Jun_10_14:37:06_2007-1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
MessageID: hfFb/bthGKqNGGbD4iBiZLHbBMEbC+lx

iQA/AwUBRmxE02Z9cbd4v/R/EQLnQQCfSFG9a6c4wxrNDa7jKitJ87eRI+YAmwS1
Op7m/FDKSO9pS5tsnW87adUg
=ctbk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pgp-sign-Multipart_Sun_Jun_10_14:37:06_2007-1--