Subject: Re: Meta package for pkgsrc developer tools
To: NetBSD Packages Technical Discussion List <tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@weird.com>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 08/12/2006 15:37:48
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Sat_Aug_12_15:37:44_2006-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
At Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:51:49 +0100,
David Laight wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 07:43:35PM -0700, John Nemeth wrote:
> >
> > cd /usr/pkgsrc && rm -r */*/work is pretty fast as well.
>
> $ echo */*/work | xargs rm -f
IIRC it had been my experience in the past that many shells were not any
more lenient at internal command-line length than their host OS was at
argv size. I don't have immediate access to any such systems to test
right now though.
Also are there not still systems using ASH or similar shells without a
built-in echo? Does pkgsrc get used on any of them? Would pkgsrc make
use of such a shell otherwise anyway?
--
Greg A. Woods
H:+1 416 218-0098 W:+1 416 489-5852 x122 VE3TCP RoboHack <woods@robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com> Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Sat_Aug_12_15:37:44_2006-1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
MessageID: KOScYgEdRuMSgFsoCFmZGQuvuWZrZ5Xg
iQA/AwUBRN4uCmJ7XxTCWceFEQIHUACfVGcXZ9u3s0uJXUopL7R17Zhcp8EAn3j7
M4O+zwoqOh45IN0uXSfYBRlA
=ZD3U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Sat_Aug_12_15:37:44_2006-1--