On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 22:06:35 +0200
Peter Schuller <peter.schuller@infidyne.com> wrote:

> But then the question becomes what language people consider acceptable. If 
> it's REALLY REALLY a huge sticking point I *might* be convinced to do it in 
> C/C++, but I would *so much* prefer not to. The prime candidate at the moment 
> would be Ruby, which seems fairly accepted over in the FreeBSD camp (what 
> with portupgrade and such).

	One consideration - the more common the language the more chance
you have of getting sent patches.

-- 
C:>WIN                                      |   Directable Mirror Arrays
The computer obeys and wins.                | A better way to focus the sun
You lose and Bill collects.                 |    licences available see
                                            |    http://www.sohara.org/