hi,

> I have looked over your patch, and it seems fine.

  Thank's for the review.

> The only thing that's not 100% clear to me is how the distinction between 
> an 'installed' package and one in a package is made - the fname variable 
> seems to be used here. If that assumption is right, maybe that should be
> documented (i.e. add a comment), or another variable with a better name 
> could be used.

  You're right, that was a quick hack to get the file name into
show_summary.  None of the other show_* function use the file name.
I'll clean that up.

> In general, the code seems to be under-commented, esp. that in var.c - 
> guessing what a function does is always painful to me.

  Okay, I'll add function comments where missing.

						yours,
						dillo