Replying to two emails:

On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Klaus Heinz wrote:

> Alan Barrett wrote:
> > I like ISO 8601 format: "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %z".  (OK, strictly speaking
> > ISO 8601 wants a literal "T" between the date and the time, but that's 
> > too ugly for me.)
> 
> Using ISO 8601 seems fine. I would vote for using it as is
> (%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S %z) but omitting the T would also be acceptable.

I already adjusted mine to use this (without the "T"). Thanks for the 
emails about this.

But now this following email suggests:

On Sat, 8 Apr 2006 joerg@britannica.bec.de wrote:
> Use either of the following formats from the HTTP RFC please :-)
> (1) Sun, 06 Nov 1994 08:49:37 GMT (from RFC 822)
> (2) Sun Nov  6 08:49:37 1994 (ANSI ctime(3) format)

Do you care if we use the format above instead?

 Jeremy C. Reed

echo ':6DB6=88>?;@69876tA=AC8BB5tA6487><' | tr '4-F' 'wu rofIn.lkigemca'