--/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 04:52:22AM +0100, Zafer Aydogan wrote:
> you say it is possible, but there is no package -- then it is not
> possible. you are contradictory.

it's not contradictory.  when i build my own binary packages with the
appropriate options (in mk.conf), i can have it.

> i say, just build a package for ap2 aswell, or -- build against ap2
> because the majority may use apache2 nowadays.

it's very easy to say "just build a package for ap2 as well" but to do
so such a feature needs to be added to the bulk-build framework.  your
code is welcome.

to say "majority may use apache2 nowadays" is a very broad
generalisation.  my experience says the opposite.  there were (are?)
numerous notorious issues with PHP when used with apache2.  i don't know
whether they are all resolved already but it was so unreliable that
nobody with common sense would use it on a production system.  and
that's not a NetBSD-specific issue.


regards,

--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@{NetBSD,Xtrmntr,silcnet}.org>   --

--/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFDy2U4iwjDDlS8cmMRAjofAJ4ht1atLSfiPCCZIrr5/As50Bgm7ACeOKW2
HNh5I6LRyXugEDZi9oCYvAk=
=zY3f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4--