Subject: Re: proposal of how to deal with missing header files supplied by nbcompat
To: Roland Illig <rillig@NetBSD.org>
From: David Laight <david@l8s.co.uk>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 12/02/2005 21:00:49
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 09:52:51PM +0100, Roland Illig wrote:
> 
> One thing I'm not quite sure is how to name the variables. 
> LIBNBCOMPAT_NEEDED is not the worst choice, but that name alone doesn't 
> tell _what_ is needed. If I said LIBNBCOMPAT_NEEDED=yes, this would also 
> sound reasonable. So I prefer LIBNBCOMPAT_NEEDED_FEATURES, even if that 
> name is a little longer. Same for NCURSES_NEEDED_FEATURES.

Does that make any difference?
Better might be
  LIBNBCOMPAT_NEEDED=xxx,yyy
where xxx and yyy are functions that (it is known) have to come from
libncompat (etc).
At least then you might have half a clue as to what doesn't work where.

	David

-- 
David Laight: david@l8s.co.uk