Subject: Re: variable naming question (fwd)
To: None <tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: iMil <imil@home.imil.net>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 12/02/2005 13:45:17
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


forwarded thought from Quentin

- ---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 13:21:31 +0100 (CET)
From: iMil <imil@home.imil.net>
To: Quentin Garnier <cube@cubidou.net>
Subject: Re: variable naming question

> Why don't you use PKG_PATH?  That's what pkg_add uses.  PACKAGES is
> something you put in mk.conf, not that you set in the environment.

sounds good, i didn't used any "known" env. variable not to interfeer with
classic package management, but the way Alistair want to use this feature
seems to do well with your thought. I still must do some tests to be sure
it doesn't affect any other part of the tool.
Thanks for the idea :)

- -------------------------
iMil <imil@home.imil.net>                                                 _
      http://gcu-squad.org                          ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
                                                     - against HTML email  X
                                                                 & vCards / \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFDkEHfFG3BlGWyzUIRAtW6AJ40Ax6UbdzGyP3lFoSuPzBY+hCjBwCeLqkO
m0Gs9PJL4qzmVGN+zBCMO1g=
=ri4W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----