On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 06:47:50AM +0200, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:

> Now this package has been deliberately renamed despite of the above
> discussion to not only conflict in the installed program (and other files')
> names, but also in the package name - isn't this bad because of conflicting
> binary package names?

Just ignore this. I need to drink more (than 0) coffee before posting.

	-is
-- 
seal your e-mail: http://www.gnupg.org/