On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Todd Vierling wrote:

>> /ftp/pub/NetBSD/packages/pkgsrc-2005Q2/NetBSD-2.0.2/amd64/devel/SDL-1.2.8nb1.tgz
>> (and i386 too)
>> has:
>> lib/libSDL.so.1 -> libSDL.so.1.0.8
>>
>> And /ftp/pub/NetBSD/packages/pkgsrc-2005Q3/NetBSD-2.0/i386/devel/SDL-1.2.9.tgz
>> has:
>>  lib/libSDL.so.2 -> libSDL.so.2.0.9
>
> Looks like SDL's buildlink3.mk needs a BUILDLINK_RECOMMENDED bump, and
> (unfortunately) everything depending on SDL directly needs a PKGREVISION
> bump.

I was not sure yet if it was a problem with the versioning, see thsi diff 
between 1.2.8 and 1.2.9 configure:

  SDL_MAJOR_VERSION=1
  SDL_MINOR_VERSION=2
-SDL_MICRO_VERSION=8
-SDL_INTERFACE_AGE=1
-SDL_BINARY_AGE=8
+SDL_MICRO_VERSION=9
+SDL_INTERFACE_AGE=2
+SDL_BINARY_AGE=9
  SDL_VERSION=$SDL_MAJOR_VERSION.$SDL_MINOR_VERSION.$SDL_MICRO_VERSION


@@ -1592,9 +1593,9 @@

  # libtool versioning
  LT_RELEASE=$SDL_MAJOR_VERSION.$SDL_MINOR_VERSION
-LT_CURRENT=$SDL_INTERFACE_AGE
-LT_REVISION=$SDL_BINARY_AGE
-LT_AGE=0
+LT_CURRENT=`expr $SDL_MICRO_VERSION - $SDL_INTERFACE_AGE`
+LT_REVISION=$SDL_INTERFACE_AGE
+LT_AGE=`expr $SDL_BINARY_AGE - $SDL_INTERFACE_AGE`


The src/Makefile.in difference related to this is:

  libSDL_la_LDFLAGS = \
         -no-undefined           \
+        -release $(LT_RELEASE) \
         -version-info $(LT_CURRENT):$(LT_REVISION):$(LT_AGE)


  Jeremy C. Reed

  	  	 	 BSD News, BSD tutorials, BSD links
 	  	 	 http://www.bsdnewsletter.com/