On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 03:13:41PM +1000, matthew green wrote:
   > 
   > i wonder if the problem is better solved by making compat_linux less
   > invasive.  does linux_sys_mkdir() need to create dirs in the emul
   > path?  looking at sys/compat/linux i would almost say that there are
   > a number of syscalls that do translation that shouldn't.  not sure that
   > files should be created here (open/creat).  not sure about mknod() but
   > this one might be known best this way.  rename() seems wrong.  symlink()
   > and link() also seem wrong.  and those are just the ones in linux_file.c.
   > 
   > i'm suspicious of any compat syscalls *creating* things inside the
   > emul dir... ie, any use of CHECK_ALT_CREAT().
   
   Installing an additional RPM?


in that case we should call rpm with --root /emul/linux.