On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 04:56:33PM +0200, Bernd Ernesti wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 08:35:58PM +0200, Dieter Baron wrote:
> > : > But I don't understand the options framework, and have a question: why not 
> > : > have a global option "use motif", which is then used here?
> > : > (better find someone else to look into that check, I'm not competent in 
> > : > that area :)
> > 
> > : There is no global "motif" option yet.  I'm pro creating one, though.  
> > 
> >   Yes, it should use a global option named motif, which will be shared
> > with any other package with optional motif support.
> 
> MOTIF_TYPE_DEFAULT from mk/motif.buildlink3.mk

  That selects which motif implementation to use, not whether to
enable support for motif in the first place.

						yours,
						dillo