On Thu, 5 May 2005 11:38:24 -0600
<brook@biology.nmsu.edu> wrote:

> Juan RP writes:
>  > agc suggested to install libkver into another LOCALBASE, and it works.
> 
> I haven't tried this particular solution, but have been wrestling with
> the same problem (i.e., bulk builds and pkg_comp) recently.  My
> solution was to modify mk/bulk/pre-build to preserve the contents of
> the libkver package if it was present.  The reasoning is much the same
> as for preserving the bootstrap tools for non-NetBSD packages.  The
> result of my patch is that one need do nothing special for a bulk
> build within the pkg_comp chroot environment when using libkver.
> 
> If there is interest in this approach, I would be glad to dredge out
> my patch.
> 
> Is there a better approach to the problem of getting bulk builds,
> pkg_comp, and libkver to play well together?

I think your suggestion to modify the pre-build script is a better way
to fix that, please send your patch.

Thanks.

(PS: Your SMTP blocked my previous email I sent you)