On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Greg A. Woods wrote:

> If you take the time to examine how and where ${SETENV} has been and is
> being used you'll find that each occurance sets _exactly_ and _only_ the
> necessary values, which means that if one sanely uses '-i' then nothing
> gets into the build of the package that's not explicitly supposed to be
> there.

Am I finding myself agreeing with you again?  I really must stop that.  8-)

Actually, there's a really good point here.  If properly tested, this might
be the best way to go.

-- 
-- Todd Vierling <tv@duh.org> <tv@pobox.com> <todd@vierling.name>