Subject: Re: gdal, openscenegraph
To: None <brook@biology.nmsu.edu>
From: Jan Schaumann <jschauma@netmeister.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 03/30/2005 11:04:35
--pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
brook@biology.nmsu.edu wrote:
=20
> I believe that the gdal package originated from our work so I'm glad
> it is of use. However, we have recently split it into several
> (gdal-lib, gdal-docs, and gdal (a metapackage)) so as to isolate the
> dependencies on doxygen, teTeX, ... .
Ah, that's nice.
> If you could send me the updates you made to the gdal package we can
> try to fold them into our new set. Or are those already committed in
> wip?
I don't know - I don't think there were many modifications. If you want
to check the differences between wip and my package, just download my
files from the URL in the previous mail and diff it against pkgsrc-wip.
-Jan
--=20
Information wants to be free.
--pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFCSs4TfFtkr68iakwRAiUAAJ4r4xdqo6WJ/+wefRVwihtRU3ICEQCdGu9J
MYqsY0MX41zZQO++Gi+OMkg=
=vFZ4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc--