Subject: Re: patches to bulk build
To: Dan McMahill <dmcmahill@NetBSD.org>
From: Hubert Feyrer <hubert@feyrer.de>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 03/11/2005 00:34:46
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Dan McMahill wrote:
> Can someone do a sanity check over this patch?  It works around
> the problem where grep on solaris (and maybe others) drops long
> lines in input files.  It seems to be working for me on solaris-2.9,
> but I'd appreciate comments on a cleaner way to do this.

I don't understand what the code does, but looking at the diff, here are a 
few comments:

  * maybe rename _ESCPATH so that it's obvious it's a version of PKGPATH,
    e.g. PKGPATH_ESC
  * in the second hunk (@@ -298,5 +300,5 @@), you replace a "grep
    | sed" call with just a (more complex) sed call. Maybe make that
    "sed | sed" (with the second one being the old sed call, unchanged),
    so it's more obvious (and more readable) on what's going on.
  * @@ -316,5 +318,7 @@: the original patch looks for "( |$$)" at the end,
    while the new version only seems to look for a space (after $$pkgdir2).
    Is that correct? (No idea what the substitution to 'yes' does.
  * @@ -346,5 +350,5 @@: Substitution patterns "^.*:" and "^[^:]*" aren't
    exactly the same IIRC (greedy match on the former). Is that intended?
    (Maybe only change one thing at a time :) Occurs in other places!
  * @@ -397,5 +401,7 @@: same as above, with "^[^:]*:[ \t]*" replacing
    "^.*:"

Can you test this on NetBSD before committing? (Just to be sure :)
Maybe doing so on a restricted bulk build with only 1-2 pkgs would be 
enough (I forgot what variable that can be set with).


  - Hubert

-- 
NetBSD - Free AND Open!      (And of course secure, portable, yadda yadda)