tech-pkg: Re: Additional handling of PLIST for PLIST.${MACHINE_ARCH} and PLIST.${OPSYS}-${MACHINE

Subject: Re: Additional handling of PLIST for PLIST.${MACHINE_ARCH} and PLIST.${OPSYS}-${MACHINE_ARCH}
To: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de>
From: grant beattie <grant@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 02/23/2005 23:45:05

--ncSAzJYg3Aa9+CRW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 05:46:20PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:

> > PLIST.${MACHINE_ARCH:C/i[3-6]86/i386/g}
>=20
> Out of curiosity (and completely off-topic): when should ${MACHINE_ARCH}
> ever be set to i486...i686? Wouldn't it make more sense to canonicalize
> the veriable when it gets set initially?

I think it should already be canonicalised by then, so it probably
isn't needed.

grant.


--ncSAzJYg3Aa9+CRW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCHHrRluYOb9yiFXoRAkMmAKCzCtgf3XxO5smR6zj8X7nBrjl1AwCfZgaN
p5SHnTvQQu/EMOZ3z+ULG2U=
=hqEM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ncSAzJYg3Aa9+CRW--