--C1iGAkRnbeBonpVg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 08:24:47PM +0100, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 09:29:01AM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > Can it be installed as bin/pwm2 and man1/pwm2.1? (My preference.) Or
> > can regular pwm be installed as bin/pwm1.  The pwm webpage mentions
> > PWM2 and PWM1.
>=20
> Yeah, and mentions pwm1 is no longer maintained.

it's really very simple, with a fixed set of features, in perfectly
working condition.

> > But Debian's ion3 (20050116-1) package and Gentoo's ion3-20050116
> > install "bin/pwm3" (like our pkgsrc ion3-devel).
>=20
> Yes, that's because Tuomo wants to allow both ion2 and ion3 on the
> same system.
>=20
> > Gentoo's ion ion2-20040729 installs bin/pwm2 and man/man1/pwm2.1.
>=20
> Well, "good for them".
>=20
> As for me, I would just remove pwm.  Lubomir, you have an opinion
> about it?

why, yes, i do.  i use it on all my machines with X installed.  i know
about few other people who use it from pkgsrc.

i am all for renaming pwm from ion2 to pwm2, there i no real reason they
should conflict.


regards,

--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@{NetBSD,Xtrmntr,silcnet}.org>   --

--C1iGAkRnbeBonpVg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCA89OiwjDDlS8cmMRAja7AJwPjUpbosrL1K5KP4YvKlMCjmU1wwCfazAN
q1yfMc0A9XtEICbGLENPKbk=
=WcEc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--C1iGAkRnbeBonpVg--