--nextPart6025792.CipLnVTUAf
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tuesday 01 February 2005 00:01, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 11:19:29PM +1030, Berndt Josef Wulf wrote:
> > any reason why this package wasn't upgraded to swig-1.3.24?
> >
> > swig-1.3.22 is old and packages that now use swig-1.3.24 won't build wi=
th
> > this version.
>
> pkgsrc/doc/TODO actually has a line for it:
>         o swig-build-1.3.24 [newer versions break subversion]
>
> Now why it would break subversion, and if subversion has been fixed
> in the meantime, I don't know.
>  Thomas

Perhaps version 1.3.24 is not backwards compatible due to certain API chang=
es.=20
In this case perhas an additional package such as swig-current could=20
accommodate applications that require the bleeding edge version.

Its strange since only the minor version number changed.

cheerio Berndt

--nextPart6025792.CipLnVTUAf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQBB/kLZcUIHpeIRpjERAqAfAKCdGFLNj2v4wc8ilSMDufMLB0Pj4ACeLvjU
Ic7Ym3fyBP/zLhWsGBICuEo=
=rqGu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart6025792.CipLnVTUAf--