--=-=-=


Todd Vierling <tv@duh.org> writes:

> On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Dan Winship wrote:
>
>> Shouldn't you leave at least the .la file in the PLIST? It seems weird to have
>> the library complete unmentioned there.
>
> I was following the model used by most partially dynamic PLIST generation,
> which typically keeps data in Makefile only.  (Related to that, to me it
> seemed more error-prone to mention the .la in both Makefile *and* PLIST.)

Will print-PLIST deal with this ? Shouldn't just the logic do the magic all
.la files in the PLIST (unless excluded) ?

Love


--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (NetBSD)
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=g+hD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--