--Signature=_Thu__29_Jul_2004_16_48_32_+0200_t+fkZIxHfOZH6aHi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:51:12 -0400 (EDT)
Todd Vierling <tv@duh.org> wrote:

Hi Todd,

> Now that lang/jdk12 exists (and lang/jdk13 is soon to come), lang/jdk seems
> a little unusual in naming compared to the other Java implementations.
> It's probably not obvious to most users that lang/jdk is only a JDK 1.1
> implementation and not capable of running many modern Java applications.
> 
> Ideally, it would be nice to delete lang/jdk altogether, but lang/jdk12 has
> redistribution restrictions.  So instead, what do y'all think of renaming
> lang/jdk to lang/jdk11?

I really agree, does that mean that we'll have in the future lang/jdk as jdk13?
that would be cool.

Cheers.

--Signature=_Thu__29_Jul_2004_16_48_32_+0200_t+fkZIxHfOZH6aHi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFBCQ5AypkLYVDran0RAswKAKCIbBr3nGMn7kiZOycBn+yfdAr12ACfRHHl
KJhweqwoms7TbzJhajIV61A=
=86dc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Thu__29_Jul_2004_16_48_32_+0200_t+fkZIxHfOZH6aHi--