=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 01 June 2004 12:51 pm, you wrote:
> "John R. Shannon" <john@johnrshannon.com> wrote:
> > In light of your post, should I hold off on importing gcc-3.4?
>
> As what do you want to import gcc-3.4?  As an update to gcc3-* or as
> separate packages?  If separate, what's the benefit of maintaining
> gcc3-* (which then would be not accurately named)?  If as an update,
> then why did you import ada separate?

1. It is a separate package. I've been working on it on wip for 5 months.

2. It should probably eventually replace gcc3. For now, because:
    - C++ is more strigently check causing a number of packages not to comp=
ile
    - I've only been able to test on ix86 and AMD 64 with NetBSD
    I recommend that it be a separate package

> Maybe bring this up on tech-pkg to see what others think?
>
> -Jan

I have a cut at a mk/compiler/gcc.mk update that I've been using here if=20
anyone is interested.

=2D --=20

John R. Shannon
john@johnrshannon.com
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkC80PsACgkQOKbCxya4HYu0ZQCgupCmVkeOXLUXOUDrgaWcuwoa
6c4AmwTf+AU85igXtuq+n0FCGIVdswfv
=3DpXSW
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----