--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 11:23:26AM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote:
> On Thursday 27 May 2004 21:57, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 May 2004, Richard Braun wrote:
> > > It seems OOo 1.1.1 has finally been merged into pkgsrc \o/. Now, is t=
here
> > > a binary package for 1.6.2 ? If not, I'm offering to create one. I've
> > > read the pkgsrc manual a bit about this, but as OOo is a big package,
> > > does someone think a simple make package won't do it ?
> >
> > AFAIK 1.6.2 isn't able to run OOo111 because of some shared object load=
ing
> > foo. A binary pkg for 2.0_BETA/i386 is available at
>=20
> These should now be fixed on the netbsd-1-6 branch
>=20
> Nick

So if I just modify the Makfile to allow build on 1.6.2, and then build it
do you think it'll work ? And again, is a simple make package to create the
binary package if the build works ?

Thanks :-).

--=20
Richard Braun

--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFAtzGgBlWsEPLYRi8RAjy7AJ92QIGa0hwE+EULkOg75K/dQHqzAwCgriPq
eZFtOG/h2yl1/Bxp4tjfX8c=
=cyNF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7--