On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 04:38:44PM +0200, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
> Now that we have non-recursive dependencies, we should only bump
> revisions for packages directly depending on a given one (in this
> case, opencdk).

Direct dependencies are more than only opencdk:
emulators/libspectrum
mail/wmbiff
security/gnutls
security/gsasl
security/libksba
security/opencdk
wip/gnupg-1.9

> Yeah, it may happen that some packages that depend on a package that
> depends on opencdk break too.  But if this happens, the former package
> was missing a direct dependency on opencdk, so it should be corrected.

Since, when the switch was flicked to non-recursive, nobody bothered
to check if every package includes all its direct dependencies' bl3 files,
I think it's far too early to follow that reasoning. Though it would
be nice if we would get to a point where it was true....

 Thomas