Subject: Re: devel/bmake update
To: None <tech-pkg@netbsd.org>
From: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 05/11/2004 16:08:12
--osDK9TLjxFScVI/L
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 09:28:11AM -0400, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@crufty.net> wrote:
> >=20
> > On Mon, 10 May 2004 17:38:56 -0700 (PDT), "Jeremy C. Reed" writes:
> > >On Mon, 10 May 2004, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> > >
> > >> Anyone see anything wrong with the patch below?
> > >
> > >I didn't try yet, but I have comments.
> > >
> > >> @@ -14,16 +14,19 @@
> > >> ONLY_FOR_PLATFORM=3D NetBSD-*-*
> > >
> > >You mention OPSYS below. It seems this implies we can get rid of this
> > >ONLY_FOR_PLATFORM definition. (I package for Linux, for example.)
> >=20
> > I have no idea why the ONLY_FOR_PLATFORM is there - the whole point of
> > bmake is building on multiple platforms ;-)
>=20
> I believe the rational was that bmake is installed during bootstrapping
> pkgsrc; installing the bmake package afterwards overwrites the first
> instance and, if removed, breaks pkgsrc.
well, not really. it is (was?) the mk-files package bmake depends on,
which completely screwed your bootstrap. the ONLY_FOR_PLATFORM can go
only when this issue is resolved.
regards,
--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@{NetBSD,Xtrmntr,silcnet}.org> --
--osDK9TLjxFScVI/L
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFAoN5MiwjDDlS8cmMRAvkdAJ9AsLwXbM3E6s+69FJT8uQ7SEagtACeKMI8
Df9J/04MsQLVFNHPl4SiUZE=
=dVV1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--osDK9TLjxFScVI/L--