--Signature=_Sat__17_Apr_2004_19_18_56_+0200_Q_kGg2K832RDYYtr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 17:06:52 +0000
"Julio M. Merino Vidal" <jmmv@NetBSD.org> wrote:

> I wonder... WTF was this package named quake2forge instead of quake2, just
> as the distfile, and as the binary, and as all other quake* packages?
> It even _renames_ the installed binary to quake2forge.
> 
> IMHO, this is aiming for confusion and extra complexity that is not worth
> it, and should be renamed to quake2.

Because the right name of the project is quake2forge, and not quake2. There
are two known ports of quake2, for example:

http://www.icculus.org/quake2/
http://www.quakeforge.net/

In the future we could import quake2 from icculus, and will have two quake2
binaries, so renaming the binary is fine IMO.

> Cheers.

-- 
	Juan RP <juan@xtraeme.unixbsd.org>

--Signature=_Sat__17_Apr_2004_19_18_56_+0200_Q_kGg2K832RDYYtr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAgWcAypkLYVDran0RAlo+AJ0ZYDghQrHgxBbj45oATvh1wrEAIgCfWtiv
4Z1DAzec+KhlN96cbR+EIWU=
=BBaC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Sat__17_Apr_2004_19_18_56_+0200_Q_kGg2K832RDYYtr--