--Signature=_Sun__11_Apr_2004_19_21_40_-0500_LVdkrj=OsaJK1L/P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

* Juan RP:
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 02:05:51 +0200 (CEST)
> "Hubert Feyrer" <hubert@feyrer.de> wrote:
> 
> > I hope the pkg names don't clash either?
> 
> I was thinking that, having two ish packages is not wrong, but
> you'll have to deinstall one if you want to build the other
> one... so it's better to avoid duplicate names.

I changed the package name and file names to avoid conflicts with
converters/ish when I reimported it.

> > BTW, wouldn't icmpshell or so be more obvious?
> 
> Agreed, icmpshell looks better, but ishell looks fine to me too... 

Indeed, but the author refers this package as ISHELL on the homepage.
So I thought it'd be better to follow it.

-- 
Min Sik Kim

--Signature=_Sun__11_Apr_2004_19_21_40_-0500_LVdkrj=OsaJK1L/P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQHnhFPQsKR/Zi7L+AQLiIgf9GS+atgaJZyYJT3Nb2oroB819TakyoyFm
Zqevlz3qInp6fx/fpSZ0uOtG8+ygCVoJgSlE8r8afSJCYDr7Haj4gauLPJZ6RVOf
SkA1iGul9VSCctjcavg3YDkgOck5iyNoqJ2n6Uj+eWwZD5sRTTbkqNutGjjaCARb
83AZP1x/6r3Ppin4EayF9x2R8n32ATnn9E9MkWupwn7fOCnLnoiaG/s4A35zGqKh
67ny00L4p5LIo8sgVPEjN9J1HFSfNitsKRSn4jKaQzW02//YkcSIxA1G1TniJelo
ZW+LNtg3JuC82kVXS+t21mvSIvE/DLx/TQpawqBN1PUYJBowWEyEMA==
=OOU/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Sun__11_Apr_2004_19_21_40_-0500_LVdkrj=OsaJK1L/P--