Subject: Re: perl modules need better, non-open dependencies
To: Jeremy C. Reed <reed@reedmedia.net>
From: grant beattie <grant@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 04/10/2004 17:29:21
--wKTlTxfx0Fr6BT7S
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 11:57:49PM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:

> > that's why I think your build is broken - I don't think that should
> > happen.
>=20
> That ("I don't think that should happen") is exactly why sent my first
> email. I think I agree. I don't think that should happen. (I don't think
> my "build is broken".)
>=20
> Te packages allow it. Please see the first email.
>=20
> The DEPENDS are open-ended. So you can easily make packages and install
> them on another system (or reinstall on same system).

my "I don't think that should happen" was referring to the mixed 5.6.x
and 5.8.x paths in @INC which seems broken to me.

grant.


--wKTlTxfx0Fr6BT7S
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFAd6JRluYOb9yiFXoRAsGdAJ9simu2ocLR9V2aEb/8a1jEHdNYFwCeNCfd
2dYeI9YI1TvnrsTbR5efuC0=
=V9jP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wKTlTxfx0Fr6BT7S--