On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:

> So you agree that the "-devel" packages should be named with -devel
> appended. And for *-current and -nightly too.
>
> Can we start doing this?

I didn't mean start doing the automatic conflicts. I meant: can we start
fixing the PKGNAMEs?

> It looks like there is only around 25 or so (not counting pkgsrc-wip).
>
> But some already do it correctly, like math/octave-current and
> cad/covered-current.

   Jeremy C. Reed
   http://bsd.reedmedia.net/