Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.3 package on -current
To: Frederick Bruckman <fredb@immanent.net>
From: grant beattie <grant@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 03/29/2004 10:01:19
--+HwY7O+GdaLKMYOv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 01:44:02PM -0600, Frederick Bruckman wrote:

> The second option would be simpler to implement -- mostly, add
> binutils-2.14.tar.gz to lang/gcc's ${DISTFILES}, and add the binutils
> binaries to the PLIST -- but longer to debug and test, as every test
> will compile binutils *and* gcc. binutils is small compared to gcc,
> though, so I personally like that option better.

requiring pkgsrc binutils on some platforms doesn't sound like "the
pkgsrc way". I don't think there's a reason we can't make pkgsrc
gcc work with the base system binutils, though it may not right now...

grant.


--+HwY7O+GdaLKMYOv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFAZ2dPluYOb9yiFXoRAtNlAJ44NvyRiyg02Jz5CpkE1OOsLmM2RwCeNi2U
sVuDikN1pOwEywQ1u4ADo0M=
=3f8V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--+HwY7O+GdaLKMYOv--