--Signature=_Tue__9_Mar_2004_09_12_41_+0100_zOcNEb7aDkizohMp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:05:56 +0200
"Mike M. Volokhov" <mishka@apk.od.ua> wrote:

> On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 10:49:16 +0100 (CET)
> Hubert Feyrer <hubert@feyrer.de> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > After getting apache2 installed after a 'pkg_add subversion', I wonder if
> > it was possible to shuffle pkg names around a bit:
> > 
> > 	subversion	=> subversion-server
> > 	subversion-base => subversion
> > 
> > Comments? Any takers?
> 
> I'm happy with current namings, so as "subversion" provides full
> Subversion package, not server only, and "subversion-base" are gives the
> minimal (?) and basic functionality of SVN. The "recommended" SVN's
> server is an Apache/WebDAV, thus installing Subversion you should be
> ready to Apache installation, isn't it?

Agreed, what's wrong with these names? I think they are ok as are now.

-- 
	Juan RP <juan@xtraeme.unixbsd.org>

--Signature=_Tue__9_Mar_2004_09_12_41_+0100_zOcNEb7aDkizohMp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFATXx5ypkLYVDran0RAnG8AJ95zxPnAcaxMZx4AVJKABHM1OrrCACbBvxZ
fEtyfmSv+uHBpcTmzsZ8Udo=
=peQs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Tue__9_Mar_2004_09_12_41_+0100_zOcNEb7aDkizohMp--