Subject: Should bsd.buildlink3.mk use BUILDLINK_PACKAGES for x11-links?
To: None <tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: Juan RP <juan@xtraeme.unixbsd.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 03/06/2004 13:23:11
--Signature=_Sat__6_Mar_2004_13_23_11_+0100_iMPPguURrj4gf=hT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Johnny,
With 1.102 of bsd.buildlink3.mk all x11 packages doesn't add the x11-links
dependency, should we add BUILDLINK_PACKAGES for this?
I'm not sure if this patch it's ok, but at least it works.
Index: bsd.buildlink3.mk
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pkgsrc/mk/buildlink3/bsd.buildlink3.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.103
diff -u -r1.103 bsd.buildlink3.mk
--- bsd.buildlink3.mk 6 Mar 2004 09:46:05 -0000 1.103
+++ bsd.buildlink3.mk 6 Mar 2004 12:17:44 -0000
@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@
USE_X11_LINKS?= YES
. if !empty(USE_X11_LINKS:M[yY][eE][sS])
BUILDLINK_DEPENDS+= x11-links
+BUILDLINK_PACKAGES:= ${BUILDLINK_PACKAGES:Nx11-links}
+BUILDLINK_PACKAGES+= x11-links
_BLNK_X11_LINKS_PACKAGE= x11-links
. else
_BLNK_X11_LINKS_PACKAGE= # empty
--
Juan RP <juan@xtraeme.unixbsd.org>
--Signature=_Sat__6_Mar_2004_13_23_11_+0100_iMPPguURrj4gf=hT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFAScKyypkLYVDran0RAoJPAKCFDpBgOW3pzkQ0xiNKeF+thvOMaACgpgI+
QEj0dseAs0ziX0sCw7/JBPg=
=ngFK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Signature=_Sat__6_Mar_2004_13_23_11_+0100_iMPPguURrj4gf=hT--