--oTHb8nViIGeoXxdp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Steve Rumble <rumble@ephemeral.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 11:55:51AM -0500, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> > Yes, but my point was that we can probably replace
> >=20
> > .if defined(USE_MIPSPRO) && (${OPSYS} =3D=3D "IRIX")
> >=20
> > with
> >=20
> > .if defined(USE_MIPSPRO)
> >=20
> > (Not only in this instance but pkgsrc-wide, I guess.)
>=20
> NetBSD/sgimips has irix emulation. I have not, nor do I know of
> anybody who has used the mipspro compiler under emulation, but I
> suppose that it is not an impossible scenario.

True - but as has been pointed out to me, regardless of whether or not
USE_MIPSPRO implies IRIX, the patch in question (as other mipspro
compiler specific patches) can be applied as soon as USE_MIPSPRO is
true, since it's compiler- and not platform-specific.  That is, MIPSPro
compilers on (actual, fictual or future) non-IRIX platforms are likely
to use the same flags as the irix-mipspro compiler.

-Jan

--=20
Except most of the good bits were about frogs, I remember that.
You would not believe some of the things about frogs.

--oTHb8nViIGeoXxdp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFAErTvfFtkr68iakwRAiaTAKD2inD5zJlCu0GhZNyhl6BigfBZgACeNblJ
rOALZRMCzS6ohvZsOVlkWXY=
=VXbI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--oTHb8nViIGeoXxdp--