Subject: Re: Rampantly unofficial bootstrap kits
To: Mike M. Volokhov <mishka@terabyte.com.ua>
From: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 01/13/2004 18:51:10
--u65IjBhB3TIa72Vp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

hi,

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 06:30:01PM +0200, Mike M. Volokhov wrote:
> That all reminded me about pkgsrc-wip bulk builds. Some time ago I've
> tried to do "cd wip && make readme", but it was stopped about ten
> times, and even more may not built. These points to low quality of
> packages (strictly say, many packages by nature are work-in-progress).
>=20
> So, it would be great to do a periodical passes trough some
> stabilization period of pkgsrc-wip.

"stabilization period of work in progress" sounds like oxymoron to me.
besides, what would be the point?


regards,

--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>                   --
--                  <salo@silcnet.org>                   --

--u65IjBhB3TIa72Vp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFABDAOiwjDDlS8cmMRAmW1AKCQ9D6wO4wutQ/oTguM6+Kbymv6AACdEM29
FE4PXHKqegBYKR2WxU6Bn1k=
=wRCB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--u65IjBhB3TIa72Vp--