On 01/04 06:39, Michal Pasternak wrote:
> No, I think we can go without lua support (Python support is a must, but
> lua? Who cares... :))). Seriously speaking, you can create "elinks"
> including lua support and "elinks-nolua" without it.

I don't think that's necessary.  The l in 'lua' is for lightweight,
after all. It's currently enabled unconditionally and no one seems to be
complaining.