Subject: Re: Moving teTeX2 to teTeX
To: Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv@menta.net>
From: Marc Recht <recht@netbsd.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 12/24/2003 11:04:15
--==========11EAF02279F00B41AF97==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
> I'm going to rename the teTeX2* packages to teTeX. Is it there any
> interest in keeping the 1.x version around? If so, I'll readd it as
> teTeX1*. May I ask _why_ do you need the older version?
I have to agree there's absolutly no reason to keep teTeX1 as the default.=20
There seems to be reason to keep teTeX1 around for a while, though.
See:
http://mail-index.NetBSD.org/tech-pkg/2003/09/24/0031.html
(If that's no longer an issue I'm all for removing teTeX1.)
--=20
Marc Recht
--==========11EAF02279F00B41AF97==========
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQE/6WSl7YQCetAaG3MRAj50AJ9IvBKZonwbkN6vsGVuGpSDXA1GAwCeMxvi
+qNnatlJfxsfxb8T72Izhbs=
=AUnW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==========11EAF02279F00B41AF97==========--