On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 04:13:41PM -0500, Adam C. Migus wrote:

> So does this mean it can go in the pkgsrc tree?  I'm interested in 
> seeing it there as well and agree that it's a shame to leave it out due 
> to the shutdown-issue along being it's only present on one platform.  
> Would it be acceptable to put it in as mysql40-server and leave the 
> other one alone as a comprimise perhaps?

we should definitely leave the existing mysql package around, as it is
still in wide use and actively maintained -- I don't think there was
any intention to "upgrade" it to 4.x.

I'll move it from -wip if nobody else feels inclined to.

grant.