--IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:09:25PM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> Is it okay if meta-packages that don't have any distfile and have any
> empty PLIST have an additional CATEGORIES "meta-pkgs"?
>=20
> Is this okay for graphics/gimp?
> -CATEGORIES=3D    graphics
> +CATEGORIES=3D    graphics meta-pkgs
>=20
> And should any others like it (true metapackage, no distfile, no
> PLIST), also add "meta-pkgs"?

what's your intention with it?  you didn't say anything about the
reasons behind it.


regards,

--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>                   --
--                  <salo@silcnet.org>                   --

--IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE/1zAGiwjDDlS8cmMRAgSjAJ9JedAJKJxWLBUdC/czfrtTzRikvwCdF3Yv
0TzIjug1JVwes9QejMokz7A=
=7I+F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6--