From:  "Julio M. Merino Vidal" <jmmv@menta.net>
	Date:  Fri, 7 Nov 2003 19:54:55 +0100


> Why?  If it's part of the teTeX2 distribution, leave it there (imo).
> Furthermore, the standalone dvipdfm package is useless because teTex1 can't
> be installed alongside with teTeX2.

Indeed, prior to this last change the dvidpfm package depended on teTeX1 so 
implicitly conflicted with teTeX2 (which already includes dvipdfm so doesnt 
need it).  Maybe this should be spelt out with an explicit CONFLICTS.

cheers
mark