On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 10:40:13AM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Marc Recht wrote:
> 
> > AFAIK teTeX2 already includes dvipdfm 0.13.2c. So IMHO print/dvipdfm should
> > rather conflict with teTeX2.
> 
> You're right. They do have files with same filenames.
> 
> Maybe the dvipdfm stuff (if okay) should be made to not install with the
> teTeX2-share, teTeX2-bin, and maybe teTeX2-sharesrc packages.

Why?  If it's part of the teTeX2 distribution, leave it there (imo).
Furthermore, the standalone dvipdfm package is useless because teTex1 can't
be installed alongside with teTeX2.

-- 
Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv@menta.net>
The NetBSD Project - http://www.NetBSD.org/