On Mon, 02 Jun 2003 18:22:12 +0300
"Mike M. Volokhov" <mishka@terabyte.com.ua> wrote:

> Next, maintaining the package in NetBSD's pkgsrc repository isn't possible
> for not NetBSD commiters. So what a big sense to take maintainership, if you
> cannot realy maintain that package?

IIRC, openbsd ports have all maintainerships set to developers, right?
(or ports@openbsd...)

> That's true in case "just to have more". But sometimes, you can faced with
> some software, which is not easy to install or something other. You think
> this software will be useful for you and you use it in learn way few days
> or even month. After that, you find more advantageous (for you) alternative
> and switch to it, but this is not means the alternative is better in all
> places than that first. Your expirience with installing and tuning first
> program already mirrored in appropriate package, but you won't maintain
> it in future. Why in this case don't set MAINTAINER to packages@netbsd.org?

I have to agree here.  And it has happened to mee too.

Cheers

-- 
Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv@menta.net>
The NetBSD Project - http://www.NetBSD.org/