Subject: Re: doc/STATUS
To: Jan Schaumann <jschauma@netmeister.org>
From: Julio Merino <jmmv@menta.net>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 04/25/2003 10:04:32
Good explanation, but this should appear in the file... I was confused
when looking at it too.
Regards
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 20:45:20 -0400
Jan Schaumann <jschauma@netmeister.org> wrote:
> Klaus Heinz <k.heinz.apr.drei@onlinehome.de> wrote:
>
> > I am confused by the contents of pkgsrc/doc/STATUS.
> >
> > It first explains what 'supported' and 'fully supported' for pkgsrc on a
> > platform means but in the following tables those categories seem to
> > refer to single packages on different platforms.
> >
> > What is the difference between 'supported' and 'fully supported' for
> > packages, eg audio/mpg123 (supported) and audio/xmms (fully supported)
> > on Solaris?
>
> I agree that this may be confusing, and the current notation does not
> help. Here is what I had in mind: a platform is considered to be
> 'supported' if all the packages listed in the first table build,
> install, run and uninstall without problems. Initially I had it look
> like this:
>
> Package Platform A Platform B ...
> -----------------------------------------------
> abc X Y
> .
> .
> .
> -----------------------------------------------
> supported: Y N
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> The packages listed in this category pull in all the basic packages
> needed for non-trivial-but-not-too-complicated environment, so if all
> are fine, the platform is 'supported'.
>
> So the list of packages you see are, in a way, a requirement for a
> platform to be labeled 'supported'.
>
> For 'fully supported' more difficult packages are listed etc.
>
> Does that clarify things for you?
>
> -Jan
>
> --
> DON'T PANIC!
--
Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv@menta.net>
The NetBSD Project - http://www.NetBSD.org/