On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 05:23:20AM +0100, Lubomir Sedlacik wrote:
> the common practice of dealing with such situations is rename the new
> package and either make them conflict or alter names of the conflicting
I suggest that you go ahead with that solution for now.

> as an alternative solution, you can ask Niels (i added him on cc:) to
> change name of the arpd package and daemon.  arpd is too generic name
I'll talk about it with Dug Song and see what we can come up with.

Niels.