At Sun, 9 Feb 2003 11:44:56 +0100 (CET),
Jaromir Dolecek wrote:
> hiramatu@boreas.dti.ne.jp wrote:
> > Is this correct fix? "link libgnomevfs.so against libgnomevfs-pthread.so" is
> > better in this case?
> 
> I think so. It's beoynd me why they use separate library and don't
> include the stuff directly in libgnomevfs.

I think it difficult to link libgnomevfs.so against libgnomevfs-pthread.so,
because libgnomevfs.so is built before libgnomevfs-pthread.so. 

So, I tried different fix. Patch below link ${LOCALBASE}/lib/vfs/libhttp.so
link against libgnomevfs-pthread.so. 

How about this? 

--- modules/Makefile.in.orig    Tue Feb 11 22:09:41 2003
+++ modules/Makefile.in Tue Feb 11 22:09:58 2003
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@
 
 
 libhttp_la_LDFLAGS = $(module_flags)
-libhttp_la_LIBADD = $(GLIB_LIBS) $(XML_LIBS) $(GCONF_LIBS)
+libhttp_la_LIBADD = $(GLIB_LIBS) $(XML_LIBS) $(GCONF_LIBS) ../libgnomevfs-pthread/libgnomevfs-pthread.la
 
 libvfs_pipe_la_SOURCES =       pipe-method.c                                   
pipe-method.h


----
// Hiramatsu, Yoshifumi
// hiramatu@boreas.dti.ne.jp