[ On Monday, October 21, 2002 at 18:42:31 (+0200), Alistair Crooks wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: download-vulnerability-list bug?
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 12:28:53PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > That's a _HUGE_ amount of hoop-jumping over-complicated accounting just
> > to satisfy a rather poorly designed integrity check.  It's doubly worse
> > considering the purpose of the content of that file.
> 
> Thanks for your opinions, Greg. I shall, as ever, give them the amount
> of respect which they are due.

I already posted an actual answer to how a proper integrity check could
be easily implemented.  Did you not read it?  Do you need help
implementing it?  (the first question is an attempt at sarcasm, the
second is serious)

-- 
								Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098;            <g.a.woods@ieee.org>;           <woods@robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>