Subject: Re: indent vs. gindent
To: James K. Lowden <jklowden@schemamania.org>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@weird.com>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 10/19/2002 17:09:53
[ On Saturday, October 19, 2002 at 16:03:52 (-0400), James K. Lowden wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: indent vs. gindent
>
> With your switches, I get:
>
> switch (which) {
> case DBSETBCP:
> tds_set_bulk(login->tds_login, (TDS_TINYINT) value);
> return SUCCEED;
> break;
> case DBSETNOSHORT:
> case DBSETENCRYPT:
> case DBSETLABELED:
>
> That's not the only example of early "case"s not obeying -cli0. But I'm
> not using 1.6; maybe it's better later.
This works fine for me, even on 1.3.2, at least when it's wrapped in
full syntax like this:
void
foo()
{
int which = DBSETBCP;
switch (which) {
case DBSETBCP:
tds_set_bulk(login->tds_login, (TDS_TINYINT) value);
return SUCCEED;
break;
case DBSETNOSHORT:
case DBSETENCRYPT:
case DBSETLABELED:
break;
}
}
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <g.a.woods@ieee.org>; <woods@robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>